Rental market report

Is Seattle, WA a good rental market?

Live data for ZIP 98101 (King County), cross-checked against FHFA HPI, Census ACS, HUD Fair Market Rent, and FBI crime records. Updated on each visit. See King County housing data

The read

Seattle, WA is a moderate market — a 17.2x price-to-rent ratio is borderline, leaning renting; individual deals decide the outcome.

Key takeaways
  • The median home value in Seattle (ZIP 98101), WA was $546,852 as of September 2026, down 4.4% year over year (ZIP market index, cross-checked against FHFA HPI).
  • The typical market rent in Seattle (ZIP 98101), WA was $2,647/mo as of September 2026, up 1.4% year over year (ZIP market-rent index).
  • Seattle (ZIP 98101), WA has a price-to-rent ratio of 17.2 — a reading that favors buying at the ZIP-index basis, while the like-for-like county basis (29.5x, county ACS value × county HUD FMR) favors renting — mixed, depending on the rent you actually face. (Computed by Areal from the figures above.)
Median home value

$546,852–$902,535

Sources disagree — showing the source range

Market index through 2026-09-01-4.4% YoY · -8.7% · 5yr
Median market rent

$2,647/mo

Likely range $2,647–$3,490

Market-rent index through 2026-09-01+1.4% YoY
Price-to-rent ratio

17.2x

Mixed — at 17.2× (ZIP market indexes) price-to-rent is borderline, leaning renting; at 29.5× (county median home value × HUD 2-BR fair market rent) it favors renting. Which applies depends on the rent you actually face.
Median household income

$124,746

EstimateACS 2024 5-year estimatesPop 2,287,171
Crime (property)

4,245/100k/yr

FBI CDE · as of 2026Seattle Police Department · FBI CDE

Cash flow at standard assumptions

20% down, 6.75% interest, 30-year loan, 1 unit · estimates only · Insurance: state-level estimate (WA avg 0.42%/yr)

Monthly cash flow

$-1,421

Cash-on-cash return

-15.6%

Cap rate

3.1%

Annual cash flow

$-17,046

Stress test

Resilience not scored — baseline already negative

A resilience score measures how many shocks a cash-flow-positive deal survives — with the baseline at −$1,421/mo there is nothing to protect, so there is no score (worst case −$1,870/mo). The rows below show how much deeper underwater each shock pushes the deal; the break-even math (rent, price, down payment, rate) lives in the cash-flow panel above.

Rent drops 10%−$199/mo deeper

Standard assumption · cash flow −$1,619/mo

Vacancy stretches to 8%−$79/mo deeper

Standard assumption · cash flow −$1,500/mo

Insurance costs rise 25%−$48/mo deeper

Standard assumption · cash flow −$1,468/mo

If financed at 8.25% instead−$449/mo deeper

Fixed-rate comparison — the deal if you'd borrowed at a higher rate today; your actual fixed payment never resets · cash flow −$1,870/mo

Worst rent drop in available history (since 2016-09-01) (−18.7% over 9 months)−$371/mo deeper

History-derived: worst decline found in any window of up to 12 months in this market's rent series, 2020-04-01 → 2021-01-01 · cash flow −$1,791/mo

Each scenario re-runs the same verified cash-flow engine with one shock applied, then re-checks the cash-flow identity before display. Standard shocks are fixed assumptions; the history-derived scenario is this market's own worst observed 12-month decline. Estimates only — not a guarantee of performance.

Report integrity

Every headline figure is independently re-derived from its raw inputs (cash-flow identity, cash-on-cash, cap rate, price-to-rent, and closed-form buy-vs-rent compounding) — the same checks the interactive analyzer runs.

Report integrity — internal re-derivation

17/17 verified
home value freshnesslatest 2026-09-01 (74d old — current for monthly cadence)
home value card↔chartcard matches chart
home value growth windowgrowth matches the 5.0yr available window
rent freshnesslatest 2026-09-01 (74d old — current for monthly cadence)
rent card↔chartcard matches chart
rent growth windowgrowth matches the 5.0yr available window
cash flow identityNOI − P&I = cash flow
cash-on-cashannual CF ÷ down matches
cap rateNOI×12 ÷ price matches
price-to-rentprice ÷ (rent×12) matches
income plausibilitywithin expected range
price-to-incomeprice ÷ income matches
buy-vs-rent: home value at termcompounds at -1.8%/yr
buy-vs-rent: total rent paidgeometric series matches
buy-vs-rent: equity builthome value − loan balance matches
buy-vs-rent: net costoutlay − equity gain matches
buy-vs-rent: savings & verdictsavings = rent − net cost, verdict matches
How the integrity pass works

Every headline figure is re-derived from the raw inputs (NOI − P&I = cash flow, CoC, cap rate) and the data feed's age is checked before the report is shown. This validates our own arithmetic — it is not independent source validation; the cross-dataset check is the data-confidence card above. An entry marked “by design” (e.g. price-to-rent) is the expected split between market rent and your rent estimate — two deliberately separate reads, not an arithmetic error.

Data quality

Cross-checked — sources diverge more than 15% on some metrics; the spread is shown, not averaged away

Estimate
home value (ZIP vs county)

ZIP market index (ZIP, monthly): $546,852 · Census ACS county median × FHFA metro HPI (current): $902,535

Spread −$355,683 · 0.61× ratio

market rent (ZIP cross-check)

ZIP market-rent index (ZIP, monthly): $2,647 · HUD Small Area FMR (ZIP, FY2027): $3,490

Spread −$843 · 0.76× ratio

Data quality score

66/100

  • − Sources diverge more than 15% on some metrics — the spread is shown, not averaged away
  • + 2 figures each cross-checked against a second, independent source
  • − ZIP market index (ZIP, monthly) vs Census ACS county median × FHFA metro HPI (current) diverge more than 15% on home value (ZIP vs county) (0.61×) — cross-checked, not verified
  • − ZIP market-rent index (ZIP, monthly) vs HUD Small Area FMR (ZIP, FY2027) diverge more than 15% on market rent (ZIP cross-check) (0.76×) — cross-checked, not verified
  • + Current home value observation (Sep 2026) — current for monthly cadence
  • + Current rent observation (Sep 2026) — current for monthly cadence

A data-quality score, not statistical confidence — it measures how well independent public sources agree, how consistent the geography is, and how fresh the data is. Survey margins of error (e.g. ACS MOEs) are not part of it. Every point is earned or lost by a reason listed above, so the score itself is auditable.

How we check this — sources, cross-checks and thresholds

Cross-checks compare two separately produced figures — not our own math re-run — and each check names its own basis. Rent: a current ZIP market-rent-index figure is checked against HUD Small Area FMR where one exists, or against Census ACS gross rent inflated to current dollars with the same ACS rent trend the charts use — a raw ~2021 ACS figure is never compared to a current one. Home value: the check pairs our current FHFA-updated estimate against the raw ACS vintage, so its spread mostly reflects price movement since the ACS measurement period (~2021). These sources measure different things (administrative benchmarks vs. rents reported by existing tenants), so disagreement is information, not error. The report shows the spread rather than averaging it away.

FHFA HPI through 2026-04-01 · ACS 2024 5-year estimates · HUD FY2027 · pulled 2026-11-13T13:07Z

Every headline metric is checked against a second figure, and each check names its own basis. Home value: the current ZIP market-index figure is paired against the county ACS × FHFA HPI estimate (current) — the spread measures ZIP-vs-county geography and methodology, not data age. Rent: the current ZIP market-rent-index figure is paired against HUD Small Area FMR when one exists for the ZIP, otherwise against the Census ACS county gross rent INFLATED to current dollars with the same ACS rent trend the rent chart uses (a raw ~2021 ACS figure is never compared to a current one). 'Verified' means the two figures agree within 15%; 'Cross-checked' means they diverge more than 15%; 'Divergent' flags a >2x difference. A spread beyond 35% is too wide to defend a single point — the headline shows the source range instead, flagged 'sources disagree'.

Seattle rental market — common questions

Is Seattle, WA a good rental market?

Mixed. Seattle's 17.2x price-to-rent ratio is moderate; rentals can cash flow, but only on well-priced properties.

What is the median home value in Seattle?

The typical home value in Seattle is about $546,852 (ZIP-level market index, cross-checked against the Census ACS county median updated by FHFA HPI), down 4.4% year-over-year, and down 8.7% over five years.

What is the median rent in Seattle?

The typical rent in Seattle is about $2,647/mo (ZIP-level market-rent index, cross-checked against HUD Small Area FMR), up 1.4% year-over-year.

Is it cheaper to rent or buy in Seattle?

Over a 7-year horizon, renting is cheaper in Seattle by about $223,043 — buying only pays off if prices appreciate faster than projected.

Is Seattle affordable for homebuyers?

Seattle's median home value is 4.4x the local median household income — Moderate (3–5x — tighter budgets).

FHFA HPICensus ACSHUD Fair Market RentZIP Market IndexesFBI Crime Data
Home value and rent are cross-checked against an independent public record before the report renders; income and crime are single-source and labeled as estimates.

Sources

Data vintages: ACS 2024 5-year estimates · HUD FY2027. For research only — verify before investing.

Areal provides area-level data for research purposes only — not an appraisal, not financial advice. Verify independently before acting.
Data from published market indexes, FHFA HPI, Census ACS, HUD Fair Market Rent, and FBI CDE — each card discloses its own vintage.

ArealArealReal data. Any area.

Data from published market indexes, FHFA HPI, Census ACS, HUD Fair Market Rent & FBI CDE. For research only — verify before investing.

Cookies — your choice

We only need essential cookies to keep you signed in. With your OK we'd also like to load analytics (Google Analytics & Microsoft Clarity) and marketing (Google Ads & Meta Pixel) cookies. See our cookie policy and privacy policy.