Areal vs. DealCheck: Screen the Market, Then Underwrite the Deal
DealCheck is the best tool for underwriting a specific listing. Areal is the best tool for deciding whether the market deserves a listing-level underwrite at all. Here's how they fit together.
DealCheck and Areal are frequently compared, but they're not really competitors — they're two halves of a disciplined acquisition process. DealCheck answers "is this property a good deal?" Areal answers "is this market one where good deals exist?" Skipping the first question wastes time; skipping the second wastes years.
The division of labor
Areal (market screen, before the search):
- Median home value and rent trends for the ZIP — not just today's number, but direction and 5-year context, anchored to FHFA HPI and Census ACS.
- HUD Fair Market Rent for your exact unit size, so the rent assumption in your eventual underwrite has a defensible baseline.
- County-level income, poverty, and population from the Census — the demand fundamentals.
- City crime from FBI data, with state-level fallbacks flagged when city data is missing.
- A cash flow estimate at your down payment and rate, plus a rent-vs-buy and renter view of the same ZIP so you can see the market from the resident's side.
DealCheck (deal underwrite, once you have a listing):
- Import the actual listing, with its real price, taxes, and HOA.
- Model rehab budgets, BRRRR scenarios, refinances, and partnership splits.
- Lender-ready PDF reports.
Where Areal is stronger
1. The market view DealCheck doesn't have. DealCheck trusts your rent and expense inputs; it won't tell you that the ZIP's median rent has been flat for two years, or that county income can't plausibly support the rents your pro forma assumes. That's exactly the context Areal provides.
2. Trends, not snapshots. A single home value is a photo; a trend is a movie. Areal shows you the movie — year-over-year and 5-year growth for both values and rents — because a "good deal" in a flat market and the same deal in a growing one are different investments.
3. Integrity checks as a first-class feature. Every Areal report runs numeric cross-checks between independent public datasets and displays the results. If the FHFA-derived value estimate and the Census-derived estimate disagree materially, it says so instead of silently averaging them.
4. Price. Areal' free tier (3 analyses/day) covers a serious market screen; DealCheck's useful tiers are paid.
Where DealCheck is stronger
Once you have a real listing, DealCheck is simply more specialized: actual listing import, rehab modeling, financing scenarios, lender reports. Areal' property mode is a screening-grade estimate built on public baselines — it will not and should not replace a listing-level underwrite with true comps, insurance quotes, and actual tax figures.
The workflow we recommend
- Screen 3–5 ZIPs in Areal (free) — pick the market where income, rent trends, and crime all point the right way.
- Search for listings in the winning ZIP.
- Underwrite the shortlist in DealCheck, using the HUD FMR baseline from step 1 as your rent sanity check.
- Sleep better, because both numbers came from tools that show their work.
Put the method to work
Run a free ZIP-level market screen on Areal — home value and rent trends, HUD fair market rent, county income, crime, and an estimated cash flow, with every source shown.
Run a free analysis